Russian Journal of Transport Engineering
Russian journal of transport engineering
           

2020, Vol. 7, No. 2. - go to content...

Permanent address of this page - https://t-s.today/en/12sats220.html

Метаданные этой статьи так же доступны на русском языке

DOI: 10.15862/12SATS220 (https://doi.org/10.15862/12SATS220)

Full article in PDF format (file size: 797.2 KB)


For citation:

Karakhanyan V.B., Ovchinnikov I.I., Baev M.A., Ovchinnikov I.G. Features of the progressive destruction of bridge structures. Russian Journal of Transport Engineering. 2020; 7(2). Available at: https://t-s.today/PDF/12SATS220.pdf (in Russian). DOI: 10.15862/12SATS220


Features of the progressive destruction of bridge structures

Karakhanyan Vadim Barmenovich
Yuri Gagarin state technical university of Saratov, Saratov, Russia
E-mail: vadimkarakhanyan@mail.ru

Ovchinnikov Ilya Igorevich
Industrial university of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
Yuri Gagarin state technical university of Saratov, Saratov, Russia
E-mail: bridgeart@mail.ru

Baev Michail Alexeevich
Penza state university of architecture and construction, Penza, Russia
E-mail: Baev-300581@mail.ru

Ovchinnikov Igor Georgievich
Industrial university of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia
Perm national research polytechnic university, Perm, Russia
E-mail: bridgesar@mail.ru

Abstract. The problem of safe maintenance of bridge structures in the event of emergency impacts is being considered. Also the problem of accounting for beyond-design-basis impacts on them is being discussed. Particular attention is paid to the problem of progressive fracture of bridges, which is practically not studied in our country. The equivalence of the problems of progressive fracture and survivability of engineering structures is discussed. An overview is given of a number of publications on bridge construction accidents with an analysis of the causes, which are divided into three groups: those caused by catastrophic natural events (60 per cent), caused by design errors and construction defects (30 per cent) and also caused by poor maintenance or excessive load (10 %).

A.V. Perelmuter’s five theses on progressive fracture are being formulated: (1) The appearance of local failures of the designed system is quite possible; (2) The process of developing sequential destruction is the most dangerous of all possible; (3) Protection against progressive collapse is possible not only by bearing structures strength reservation of the construction, but on the basis of an analysis of the genesis of emergencies it is possible to propose other safety methods against progressive collapse; (4) When modelling the processes of progressive fracture, dynamic effects accompanying the removal of individual elements from the system should be taken into account; (5) If progressive fracture is unavoidable, ways should be sought to localize it and reduce its effects.

At the end of the article, examples of progressive fracture of bridge structures due to the loss of sustaining capacity by the main members (due to corrosion cracking of the reinforcement) and owing to the partial fracture of some load-bearing elements of bridge superstructures are given. A conclusion is made on the need to organize scientific research on the progressive fracture of bridge structures.

Keywords: bridge structures; progressive fracture; bridge construction accidents; causes of accidents; bridge collapses; Tacoma Narrows bridge

Download article in PDF format

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2413-9807 (Online)

Dear readers! Comments on articles are accepted in Russian and English.
Comments are moderated and appear on the site after verification by the editor.
Comments not related to the subject of the article are not published.

Добавить комментарий